According to Nussbaum, there are three abilities that will allow students to effectively advance the pursuit of truth and justice. These are Socratic self-examination, world citizenship, and narrative imagination.2
Socratic self-examination refers to "the capacity for critical examination of oneself and one's traditions."3 An individual who practices this well will not accept any belief as authority without first challenging it. At the base, this is one trait that defines a lawyer, as it is part of the job description. However, Nussbaum's concern is that "all too often, mere rhetoric and the attempt to sway public opinion dominate over attempts to reason clearly and well." Nussbaum also points out that "because one purpose at least of legal education is to produce lawyers who win,"4 younger lawyers may get the impression that a good lawyer is one who wins regardless of his or her opponent or the truth.
When it comes to law schools, Nussbaum's worry is that "emphasis is placed on the ability to give quick answers, and to admit to being puzzled—a key Socratic virtue—will not get the student very far."5 The practical arena does not help much to promote careful reflection because corporations and firms must tailor their services to the clients who want immediate solutions to all of their problems and, most importantly, a lawyer who wins.
Finally, the narrative imagination is defined as "the ability to think what it might be like in the shoes of a person different from oneself."6 Although a separate category, this quality is related to the preceding two qualities briefly discussed in this article. Because lawyers are also counselors to their clients, the development of this quality allows for the lawyer to empathize with the client's case. As a result, the lawyer will be able to understand the client's plight and be able to better advocate the client's position to a jury, for example.
The narrative imagination also allows the lawyer in the global law firm or corporation with the comparative perspective to expand upon that perspective and relate to other individuals. For example, a lawyer who has studied the middle class will be well equipped based on fact to make policy decisions directed towards the middle class. However, if asked to make policy decisions for the poor, an inflexible imagination will not allow the lawyer to make good decisions. Nevertheless, a narrative imagination must be tempered by fact. Otherwise, it leaves room for an unrestrained imagination, which will only result in impractical or harmful policies.
Nevertheless, in light of the beginning of 2006, reflection allows for further development in both the practical and academic arenas. Regardless of how much reflection is done, a small improvement in either is better than no improvement and will allow for better lawyers who, hopefully, will serve the greater good.
1. Martha C. Nussbaum, Cultivating Humanity in Legal Education, 70 U. Chi. L. Rev. 265 (2003).
2. See id. at 269-71.
3. Id. at 269.
4. Id. at 272.
5. Id.
6. Id. at 277.
