"The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has continued to uphold that negligent defendants are liable for all the harm that flows from an initial injury," noted Ciocci's attorney, Daniel Mann of Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner & Weinstock on www.law.com.
However, the Taj Mahal representatives argued that, while they were responsible for the broken toilet, they were not "liable for the second accident."
But Mann disagreed. "They could have proven via trial testimony from a biomechanical expert and several physicians that Ciocci's injuries from the first fall required an operation and that she was never able to obtain full relief," he said to www.law.com. "He also said the witnesses would have been able to testify her left arm was left weakened from the 2004 fall; she didn't have the strength to brace herself when she lost her balance in April 2006."
Ciocci, because of her injuries, is now limited to her living room and may have to pay up to $9111, 388.47 to meet her nursing needs.
As for the $1.2 million, Mann said, "We're hoping she'll be able to use some of this money to make improvements to her house so she'll be able to get around."