Vioxx Class Action Suit Rejected

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

updated Apr 08, 2011

By Author - LawCrossing

09/13/07

With "nearly 27,000 individual lawsuits from people claiming Vioxx [had] harmed them," the article continues, Merck, had the class action case continued, could have been out $15 billion to $18 billion.

In 2003, Chris Seeger sued Merck "on behalf of the [International Union of Operating Engineers]..., arguing that if Merck had disclosed those risks earlier, prescription plans would have favored other painkillers," says the article.

Agreeing with Seeger, a state judge and an appeals court approved the suit; however, Merck appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Five judges sided with Merck.

United States
"The judges...wrote that the engineers' union and the other third-party payers 'are well-organized institutional entities with considerable resources,' and that it was unlikely their claims were too small to pursue individually."

Now, after the class action suit's rejection, Seeger will "now pursue separate claims on behalf of individual unions."

"'Merck temporarily dodged a bullet. Merck didn't totally dodge the bullet,'" said Seeger.

The drug, Vioxx, was discovered to increase the risks of heart attacks and strokes and was pulled from shelves three years ago.
Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 2 votes, average: 4.3 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Related