Indiana's Voter ID Law Challenged

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

updated Mar 26, 2011

By Author - LawCrossing

01/09/08

In April 2006, a federal judge approved a law requiring all Indiana voters to provide current governmental identification before casting a ballot. However, the law has fallen under scrutiny and is being challenged, just in time for the 2008 elections.

The law, according to proponents, is intended to prevent voter fraud, but it faces strong opposition, mostly from the Democrats. They claim that the law has only prevented qualified citizens from voting and targets the poor, minorities, and the elderly, who cannot afford governmental identification or do not have the means of traveling somewhere to update their IDs.

And most critically, Democrats assert that they can prove the law's detrimental effects: Republican Valerie Williams, 61, who had voted many times before, was not permitted to cast her ballot because she did not have a current government photo ID; her driver's license had expired. Democrat Mary-Jo Criswell, 71, was also not allowed to vote because her old ID was no longer acceptable.

"It was particularly galling for me since I was a former voting precinct committeewoman, and I, of all people, should not be missing an election," said Criswell.

United States
Thirty-one others were also unable to vote because they did not have the proper identification.

Supporters of the law, however, who are mostly Republicans, believe the law would help stop voter fraud. And while Indiana has not had any "voter impersonation" to date, Republicans argue that prior evidence that "fraud was actually taking place" is not necessary. Instead, the law would be there to deter any voter fraud in the future.

"The state's interest in deterring voter fraud before it happens is evident from the monumental harm that can come from such fraud."


Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 1 vote, average: 4.3 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Related