No More Judicial Wigs?

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

published October 03, 2008

By Author - LawCrossing

10/03/08

When you think of English courtrooms, the wigs almost immediately come to mind. Black robes and long, flowing wigs — of all white hair, come to think of it. Yes, British judges have been wearing wigs for at least 300 years as they've ruled their courtrooms with an iron gavel, so to speak.

But no more! As of October 2nd, British judges in civil cases are ditching the old horsehair wigs. With the wigs gone, the only uniform will be a new ''dark blue gabardine robe with velvet facings.''

Reviews, according to the London Times, are mixed. With critiques of the new look including ''warlords from outer space'' and ''fascist storm trooper,'' it appears that many people are missing the traditional attire already.

But that's okay because if you still have a hankering to see your judges in long, flowing horsehair wigs, you can. Just commit a crime and get caught — criminal judges haven't gone the way of their civil judge counterparts. Of course, as you look up from the dock, that may not be the first thing on your mind.
United States

Still, some say it is time to move on. After all, hair styles have changed somewhat in 300 years. Horsehair is probably rather passé, as they say.

All the same, when a tradition such as this bites the dust, it can't help but be missed somewhat. Over here in America, some judges could use a bit more flair, and the wigs certainly provided that to their British counterparts.

So, farewell to the wig!
Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 13 votes, average: 3.8 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Related