A Scholar's Son's Sea Scrolls Conviction

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

updated Nov 29, 2010

By Author - LawCrossing

10/04/10

The case revolves around the Dead Sea Scrolls and accusations that Golb harassed and attempted to discredit his father's detractors, who he insists refuse to allow him or his father, Professor Norman Golb, examine them. There were 31 charges levied against him and he was convicted of all but one, a single count of criminal impersonation.

The fifty year old New York lawyer set up bogus email addresses and wrote several blogs under fictitious names in an effort to defend his father against those he was in an international debate with. The debate revolves around the authenticity and origins of the 2,000 year old documents that are believed to be the first versions of the Hebrew Bible.

The district attorney said his actions were criminal; Golb and his camp say it was nothing more than his way of ''using irony, satire and parody to expose a plagiarist''. He was initially arrested March 5, 2009 and then released the next day on his own recognizance. His attorney argued his First Amendment rights were trampled on. His crimes run the gamut from theft to harassment to another criminal impersonation of one of his father's rivals, Dr. Lawrence Schiffman.

The senior Golb and Schiffman have debated the authenticity of the Dead Sea Scrolls for decades and once it became clear his old rival's son was the one responsible for the bogus blogs and emails that kept popping up, Schiffman went to the authorities. Both Golbs have said they believe they are being kept from investigating the Scrolls for themselves and that there is a conspiracy behind those efforts. It wasn't until after a lengthy investigation that the junior Golb was arrested and charged.
United States

The jury was out for a mere five hours before returning with its verdict. He could be ordered to prison for four years when he returns to court for sentencing on November 18. Until then, he is free on bond and in a press release, he told the media he'd be using this time working on his appeal with his lawyers. Professor Norman Golb continues to support his son and said, ''My son is an honorable person''.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance had his own comment:

''Using fictitious identities to impersonate victims is not what open academic debate seeks to foster.''
Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 1 vote, average: 2.5 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Related