Currently 34 states have criminal laws in place that penalize those who knowingly expose another person to the HIV-virus. While many argue that these laws promote discrimination against infected individuals, others assert that such laws are necessary to protect the population from irresponsible behavior.
Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif. insists that many of these laws are outdated and only function to criminalize “a population of people who should not be criminalized.” In September she crafted a bill that, if passed, would provide incentives to encourage states to reevaluate their laws based on modern medical developments. A number of the state laws concerning HIV transmission were put in place prior to the discovery of life-saving medication regiments. Furthermore, prosecutions occur even when virus transmission does not occur. Whether any of the women involved became infected with HIV through their contact with Davis was not discussed in the trial.
There have a number of similar cases in Ohio alone in the recent past. According to the state law, those who have tested positive must inform partners of this fact prior to any sex act, regardless of whether safe sex is practiced.
In 2009, a HIV-positive Iowa man was given a 25-year sentence for his failure to inform a sexual partner of his HIV status. The sentence was later dropped but he was forced to register as a sex offender.
Similarly, in 2008, an HIV-infected homeless man was sentenced to 35 years in a Texas prison for spitting at a police officer. According to the Centers for Disease Control, there are no documented cases of HIV being transmitted through saliva, tears, or sweat but according to Texas law, the saliva of a HIV-infected person is regarded as a deadly weapon.
While HIV is most commonly transmitted by a HIV-positive individual through unprotected sex, needle sharing, or in the birthing process, a bite that draws blood or breaks the skin can also lead to infection in some instances.